Clinical Research
PDF EndNote BibTex RIS Cite

Olimpik Stil Halterde Elit ve Sub-Elit Kadın Haltercilerin Q-Açıları

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 177 - 192, 29.12.2022

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, elit ve sub-elit kadın halter sporcularının quadriseps femoris kas açısını (Q açısı) belirlemek ve ayrıca, Q açısının bazı fiziksel parametreler, spor seviyeleri ve halter performansları ile ilişkisini incelemektir. Araştırmaya uluslararası Olimpik halter şampiyonalarına katılan elit halterciler (EH), (n=18) ve ulusal-uluslararası halter turnuvalarında halter şampiyonalarına katılan sub-elit sağlıklı kadın halterciler (n=18) katılmıştır. Q açıları, sporcular sırtüstü yatar pozisyonunda hareketsizken bir gonyometre ile ölçüldü. Ayrıca, uyluk uzunluğu (UU), uyluk çevresi (UÇ), pelvik genişlik (PG) ve diz ekstansiyon-fleksiyon kas kuvvetleri ölçüldü. İstatistiksel analiz; t-Test, eşleştirilmiş örneklem t-Testi ve Pearson korelasyon analizleri ile SPSS programıyla yapıldı. p< .05 anlamlı olarak kabul edildi. EH ve sub-EH’lerin demografik ve antropometrik değerleri arasında yaş haricinde fark gözlenmedi (p>.05). Sub-EH'lerin sağ-sol Q açısı değerlerinin (sırasıyla 16,67±2,43o ve 18,28±2,70o) EH'lerden (sırasıyla 14,56±2,68o± ve 14,94±2,21o), p<.05, p<.001, sırasıyla) daha büyük olduğu belirlendi. Sub-EH'lerin sağ-sol Q açıları arasında da farklılıklar tespit edildi (p<.05). Sub-EH'lerde sağ Q açısının vücut kitle indeksi, sağ UU, sol UÇ, PG, halter performansları ve spor geçmişi ile pozitif ve anlamlı olarak ilişkili olduğu görüldü (p<.05). Bu araştırmada, elit halter seviyesine bağlı olarak halter performansı artarken, Q açısının azaldığı gözlendi.

References

  • Baltzopoulos, V., Gleeson, N. (2009). Skeletal muscle function. In Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual, (3rd ed., Eds R Eston, T Reilly): 3-32. London, Routledge, 2009.
  • Bayraktar, B., Yücesir, İ., Öztürk, A., Çakmak, A. K., Taşkara, N., Kale, A., et al. (2004). Change of quadricepsanglevalueswithageandactivity. SaudiMed J, 25 (6):756-760.
  • Biedert, R. M., and, Warnke, K. (2001). Correlationbbetweenbthe Q angle and the patella position: a clinical and axial computed tomography evaluation. Arch Orthop Traum Su, 121: 346-9.
  • Bloomfield, J., Polman, R., O'Donoghue, P., & McNaughton, L. (2007). Effective speed and agility conditioning methodology for and omintermittent dynamic type sports. J Strength CondRes. 21:1093-100.
  • Byl, T., Cole, J., Livingston, L. A. (2000). What determinest hemagnitude of the Q-angle? A preliminarystudy of selectedskeletalandmuscularmeasures. Journal of Sports Rehabilitation. 9 (1):26-34.
  • Caia, J., Weiss, L. W., Chiu, L. Z., Schilling, B. K., & Paquette, M. R. (2016). Consistency of lower-body dimensions using surfacel and Marks and simple measurement tools. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 30(9): 2600-2608.
  • De, SteCroix., M., Deighan, M., & Armstrong, N. (2004) Time to peak torque for knee and elbow extensors and flexors in children, teenagers and adults. IsokinetExercSci.12: 143-8.
  • Dunn, J., Iversen, M. (2003). Interrater reliability of knee muscle forces obtained by hand-held dynamometer from elderly subjects with degenerative back pain. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 26 (3), 436–442.
  • Eliöz, M., Atan, T., Saç, A., Yamak, B. (2015). The investigion of the relatonship between some physicial features with Q angle in athletes and sedanteres. Journal of Sports andPerformance Researches, 6(1):58-65.
  • Erdağı, K., Altunok, M. K., Tüfekçi, O., Özel, R., Işık, B., & Ünüvar, S. B. (2022). Quadrıceps Femorıs Angle Of Elıte And Non-Elıte Athletes In Olympıc Style Weıghtlıftıng. Khyber Medıcal Unıversıty Journal, 14(1); 56-62.
  • European Weightlifting Federation. http://result.ewfed.com/ (accessed Jun 2022).
  • Hahn, T., & Foldspang, A. (1997). The Q angle and sport. MedSci Sports Exerc. 7: 43-48.
  • Hazar, K., Gürsoy, R., Günay, A. R. (2016). The analysıs of patellafemoral(q)angle’s correlatıon between leg strength and balance ın athletes. Niğde University Journal of Physical Education And Sport Sciences, 10(2), 182-192.
  • Herrington, L., & Nester, C. (2004). Q-angleundervalued? Therelationshipbetween Q-angleandmedio-lateralposition of thepatella. ClinBiomech. 19: 1070-3.
  • Hewett, T. E., Meyer, G. D., Ford, K. R., et al., (2005). Blome Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med.33: 492-501.
  • Horton, M. G & Hall, T.L.. (1989). Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. PhysicalTherapy, 69(11), 897–901.
  • Kishali, N. F., İmamoglu, O., Burmaoglu, G., Atan, T., Yildirim, K. (2004). Q-angle values of elite soccer and taekwondo athletes. ThePainClinic, 16(1), 27–33.
  • Messier, S. P., Davis, S. E., Curl, W. W., Lowery, R. B., & Pack. R. J. (1991). Etiologic factors associated with patellofemoral pain in runners. MedSci Sports Exerc. 23: 1008-15.
  • Mohamed, E. E., Useh, U., Mtshali, B. F. (2012). Q-angle, Pelvic width, and Intercondylarnotch width as predictors of knee injuries in women soccer players in South Africa. African health sciences. 12(2), 174-180.
  • Mohanty, N. R., Tiwari, A., & Koley, S. (2019). Bilateral Correlation Of Q-Angle With Selected Lower Extremity Biomechanical Alignment variables InState Level Female Basket-BallPlayers. EJPESS.
  • Muratlı, S., Toraman, F., Çetin, E. (editors). (2000). Sportif hareketlerin biomekanik temelleri. Ankara, Bağırgan Yayınevi. p.198-228. (In Turkish).
  • Norton, K. (2018). Standards for anthropometry assessment. In Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology, (4th ed., Eds K Norton, R Eston ): 68-137. London and New York, Routledge, 2018.
  • O'brien, M. (2001). Clinical anatomy of the patellofemoral joint. IntSportMed J.2(1): 1-8.
  • Sarkar, A., Razdan, S., Yadav, J., Bansal, N., Kuhar, S, and Pahuja, P. (2009). Effect of isometricquadricepsactivation on "Q" angle in youngfemales. Indian J PhysiolPharmacol. 53: 275-8.
  • Turkish Weightlifting Federation. https://halter.gov.tr/sonuclar/ (accessed Jun 2022).
  • Weiss, L., DeFores,t B., Hammond, K., Schilling, B., Ferreira, L. (2013). Reliability of goniometry-based Q-angle. PM&R. 5(9): 763-768.
  • Wilson, T., Kitsell, F. (2002). Is the Q-angle an absolute or variable measure? Physiotherapy. 88:296–302.
  • Woodland, L. H., & Francis, R. S. (1992). Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions. Am J Sports Med. 20:208-11.
  • World Weightlifting Federation. https://www.iwf.net/new_bw/results_by_events/ (accessed Jun 2022).
  • Yilmaz, A., Kabadayi, M., Mayda, M., Çavusoglu, G., Tasmektepligi, M. (2017). Analysis of Q angle values of female athletes from different branches. SciMovHeal. 17(2), 141-146.
  • Yücel DB. (1995). Normal q-angle values and the factors that effect these values, Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2:28–37. (In Turkish).

Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 177 - 192, 29.12.2022

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the quadriceps femoris muscle angle (Q-angle) of elite and sub-elite female weightlifters, and also to examine the relationship of Q-angle with some physical parameters, training experience and weightlifting performances. Elite weightlifters (EWL) participating in international Olympic style weightlifting championships (n=18) and sub-elite healthy female weightlifters participating in weightlifting championships in National-International Weightlifting Tournaments participated in the research (n=18). The Q-angles were determined with a goniometer in the supine position at rest. Also, thigh length (TL), thigh girth (TG), pelvic width (PW) and knee extension-flexion muscle strength were measured. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS program. p< .05 was accepted significantly. No difference was observed between the demographic and anthropometric values of the EWLs and sub-EWLs (except for age; p>.05). It was determined that the right-left Q-angle values of the sub-EWLs (16.67±2.43o and 18.28±2.70o, respectively) were greater than the EWLs (14.56±2.68o± and 14.94±2.21o, respectively, p<.05, p<.001, respectively). Differences were detected between the right-left Q-angles of sub-EWLs (p<.05). In sub-EWLs, it was observed that the right Q-angle was positively correlated with weightlifting performances and training experience (p<.05). In this study, it was observed that while weightlifting performance increased depending on the elite weightlifting level, the Q-angle decreased.

References

  • Baltzopoulos, V., Gleeson, N. (2009). Skeletal muscle function. In Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual, (3rd ed., Eds R Eston, T Reilly): 3-32. London, Routledge, 2009.
  • Bayraktar, B., Yücesir, İ., Öztürk, A., Çakmak, A. K., Taşkara, N., Kale, A., et al. (2004). Change of quadricepsanglevalueswithageandactivity. SaudiMed J, 25 (6):756-760.
  • Biedert, R. M., and, Warnke, K. (2001). Correlationbbetweenbthe Q angle and the patella position: a clinical and axial computed tomography evaluation. Arch Orthop Traum Su, 121: 346-9.
  • Bloomfield, J., Polman, R., O'Donoghue, P., & McNaughton, L. (2007). Effective speed and agility conditioning methodology for and omintermittent dynamic type sports. J Strength CondRes. 21:1093-100.
  • Byl, T., Cole, J., Livingston, L. A. (2000). What determinest hemagnitude of the Q-angle? A preliminarystudy of selectedskeletalandmuscularmeasures. Journal of Sports Rehabilitation. 9 (1):26-34.
  • Caia, J., Weiss, L. W., Chiu, L. Z., Schilling, B. K., & Paquette, M. R. (2016). Consistency of lower-body dimensions using surfacel and Marks and simple measurement tools. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 30(9): 2600-2608.
  • De, SteCroix., M., Deighan, M., & Armstrong, N. (2004) Time to peak torque for knee and elbow extensors and flexors in children, teenagers and adults. IsokinetExercSci.12: 143-8.
  • Dunn, J., Iversen, M. (2003). Interrater reliability of knee muscle forces obtained by hand-held dynamometer from elderly subjects with degenerative back pain. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 26 (3), 436–442.
  • Eliöz, M., Atan, T., Saç, A., Yamak, B. (2015). The investigion of the relatonship between some physicial features with Q angle in athletes and sedanteres. Journal of Sports andPerformance Researches, 6(1):58-65.
  • Erdağı, K., Altunok, M. K., Tüfekçi, O., Özel, R., Işık, B., & Ünüvar, S. B. (2022). Quadrıceps Femorıs Angle Of Elıte And Non-Elıte Athletes In Olympıc Style Weıghtlıftıng. Khyber Medıcal Unıversıty Journal, 14(1); 56-62.
  • European Weightlifting Federation. http://result.ewfed.com/ (accessed Jun 2022).
  • Hahn, T., & Foldspang, A. (1997). The Q angle and sport. MedSci Sports Exerc. 7: 43-48.
  • Hazar, K., Gürsoy, R., Günay, A. R. (2016). The analysıs of patellafemoral(q)angle’s correlatıon between leg strength and balance ın athletes. Niğde University Journal of Physical Education And Sport Sciences, 10(2), 182-192.
  • Herrington, L., & Nester, C. (2004). Q-angleundervalued? Therelationshipbetween Q-angleandmedio-lateralposition of thepatella. ClinBiomech. 19: 1070-3.
  • Hewett, T. E., Meyer, G. D., Ford, K. R., et al., (2005). Blome Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med.33: 492-501.
  • Horton, M. G & Hall, T.L.. (1989). Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. PhysicalTherapy, 69(11), 897–901.
  • Kishali, N. F., İmamoglu, O., Burmaoglu, G., Atan, T., Yildirim, K. (2004). Q-angle values of elite soccer and taekwondo athletes. ThePainClinic, 16(1), 27–33.
  • Messier, S. P., Davis, S. E., Curl, W. W., Lowery, R. B., & Pack. R. J. (1991). Etiologic factors associated with patellofemoral pain in runners. MedSci Sports Exerc. 23: 1008-15.
  • Mohamed, E. E., Useh, U., Mtshali, B. F. (2012). Q-angle, Pelvic width, and Intercondylarnotch width as predictors of knee injuries in women soccer players in South Africa. African health sciences. 12(2), 174-180.
  • Mohanty, N. R., Tiwari, A., & Koley, S. (2019). Bilateral Correlation Of Q-Angle With Selected Lower Extremity Biomechanical Alignment variables InState Level Female Basket-BallPlayers. EJPESS.
  • Muratlı, S., Toraman, F., Çetin, E. (editors). (2000). Sportif hareketlerin biomekanik temelleri. Ankara, Bağırgan Yayınevi. p.198-228. (In Turkish).
  • Norton, K. (2018). Standards for anthropometry assessment. In Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology, (4th ed., Eds K Norton, R Eston ): 68-137. London and New York, Routledge, 2018.
  • O'brien, M. (2001). Clinical anatomy of the patellofemoral joint. IntSportMed J.2(1): 1-8.
  • Sarkar, A., Razdan, S., Yadav, J., Bansal, N., Kuhar, S, and Pahuja, P. (2009). Effect of isometricquadricepsactivation on "Q" angle in youngfemales. Indian J PhysiolPharmacol. 53: 275-8.
  • Turkish Weightlifting Federation. https://halter.gov.tr/sonuclar/ (accessed Jun 2022).
  • Weiss, L., DeFores,t B., Hammond, K., Schilling, B., Ferreira, L. (2013). Reliability of goniometry-based Q-angle. PM&R. 5(9): 763-768.
  • Wilson, T., Kitsell, F. (2002). Is the Q-angle an absolute or variable measure? Physiotherapy. 88:296–302.
  • Woodland, L. H., & Francis, R. S. (1992). Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions. Am J Sports Med. 20:208-11.
  • World Weightlifting Federation. https://www.iwf.net/new_bw/results_by_events/ (accessed Jun 2022).
  • Yilmaz, A., Kabadayi, M., Mayda, M., Çavusoglu, G., Tasmektepligi, M. (2017). Analysis of Q angle values of female athletes from different branches. SciMovHeal. 17(2), 141-146.
  • Yücel DB. (1995). Normal q-angle values and the factors that effect these values, Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2:28–37. (In Turkish).

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Sport Sciences
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Bülent IŞIK
KARAMANOGLU MEHMETBEY UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE
0000-0001-8753-8302
Türkiye


Kenan ERDAĞI
NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY, AHMET KELEŞOĞLU FACULTY OF EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS
0000-0002-2338-6546
Türkiye

Supporting Institution yok
Thanks The authors thank the Turkish Weightlifting Federation and weightliftersfor their cooperation and participationin the study and instructor Erkan ÖZBAY for him contribution.
Publication Date December 29, 2022
Submission Date August 31, 2022
Acceptance Date December 2, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Cite

Bibtex @clinical research { asujshr1169158, journal = {Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches}, eissn = {2757-6310}, address = {Aksaray Üniversitesi Rektörlük İdari Birimler Spor ve Sağlık Alanında İhtisaslaşma Koordinatörlüğü Aksaray/Merkez, 68100}, publisher = {Aksaray University}, year = {2022}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {177 - 192}, title = {Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting}, key = {cite}, author = {Işık, Bülent and Erdağı, Kenan} }
APA Işık, B. & Erdağı, K. (2022). Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting . Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches , 3 (2) , 177-192 . Retrieved from http://asujshr.aksaray.edu.tr/en/pub/issue/73325/1169158
MLA Işık, B. , Erdağı, K. "Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting" . Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches 3 (2022 ): 177-192 <http://asujshr.aksaray.edu.tr/en/pub/issue/73325/1169158>
Chicago Işık, B. , Erdağı, K. "Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting". Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches 3 (2022 ): 177-192
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting AU - BülentIşık, KenanErdağı Y1 - 2022 PY - 2022 N1 - DO - T2 - Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 177 EP - 192 VL - 3 IS - 2 SN - -2757-6310 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting %A Bülent Işık , Kenan Erdağı %T Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting %D 2022 %J Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches %P -2757-6310 %V 3 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD Işık, Bülent , Erdağı, Kenan . "Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting". Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches 3 / 2 (December 2022): 177-192 .
AMA Işık B. , Erdağı K. Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting. ASUJSHR. 2022; 3(2): 177-192.
Vancouver Işık B. , Erdağı K. Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting. Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches. 2022; 3(2): 177-192.
IEEE B. Işık and K. Erdağı , "Q-Angles of Elite and Sub-Elite Female Weightlifters in Olympic Style Weightlifting", Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 177-192, Dec. 2022

An International Peer-Reviewed e-Journal / Period: Biannually / Founded: 2020 / Publisher: Aksaray University

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.